<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Meaning</title>
	<link>http://www.prestonsmalley.com/2007/08/making-meaning/</link>
	<description>How we can lead the eCommerce industry thru customer-centered design</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.prestonsmalley.com/2007/08/making-meaning/#comment-11217</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.prestonsmalley.com/2007/08/making-meaning/#comment-11217</guid>
		<description>Just a note. In your list, you have "Functional" and "Economic" reversed from how we discussed and portrayed these in the book. Also, there isn't a good word we've found to describe Status and Identity as an adjective as succinctly as the rest. "Social" comes close but has too many other connotations that it doesn't tell the whole story. "Personal" isn't quite right either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note. In your list, you have &#8220;Functional&#8221; and &#8220;Economic&#8221; reversed from how we discussed and portrayed these in the book. Also, there isn&#8217;t a good word we&#8217;ve found to describe Status and Identity as an adjective as succinctly as the rest. &#8220;Social&#8221; comes close but has too many other connotations that it doesn&#8217;t tell the whole story. &#8220;Personal&#8221; isn&#8217;t quite right either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
